TSV PCF's

TSV on top of price(jnorfy)

I wanted to find TSV's in the upper 15% of the trading range on Zoom 5 (100 days or so) daily charts. but you can't say (tsvmaxh100) or anything to that effect. so i settled for tsv's above zero, and increasing. i wanted this to be significantly above price, but not a hammered stock. hmmm, what to do? so i searched for stocks trading in the 30-50 percentile of their 100d range. the formula looked like this:

(TSV1 > 0) AND (TSV5 > 0) AND (TSV18 > 0) AND (TSV18 > 1.5 * TSV18.35) AND (C < (((MAXH100 -MINL100) / 2) + MINL100)) AND (C > ((.3 * (MAXH100 - MINL100) / 2)) + MINL100))

I get a lot of tsv's at about 0 and stocks in th 48-50% so not good finds, but some interesting picks. ones to watch for a month or 2 see what they do. If anyone can make a better formula, or streamline that one, please, help is appreciated.

TSV's(JIM P64)

a certain part of the trading range, create a PCF which contains (TSV18) which gives you "TSV18 today". Then set up a scan using the PCF, and crank the rank scale up to whatever level you want. A rank of 99 out of 99 will give you TSV's in the top quarter of any chart, but you can use whatever rank values suit the circumstances. You can scan for negative divergences using a PCF that says "TSV18 _ days ago was greater than TSV18 today and PMA _ days ago was less than PMA today", or reverse them for positive divergences. I'm not sure if this is what you were looking for or not, but I hope it helps. Jim

TSV18 crossing its 13 day ma(Paid my dues)

To the upside: (TSV18.1 < AVG(TSV18.1,13)) AND (TSV18 > AVG(TSV18,13))

To the downside: (TSV18.1 > AVG(TSV18.1,13)) AND (TSV18 < AVG(TSV18,13))

Add in a slope setting (write this formula in personal scan and adjust the value in easyscan): ((TSV18/TSV18.1)-1)*100

TSV18 crossing above 10 dma of TSV18(Paid my dues)

(TSV18.1<AVG(TSV18.1,10))AND(TSV18>AVG(TSV18,10))

TSV18 up 5% & crossing 13 day MA(mcsteiny)

Thanks very much for this scan. I took a stab at putting another touch on it today. So, I wrote this:

((TSV18>(TSV18.1*1.05)) AND (TSV18.1<AVG(TSV18.1,13)) AND (TSV18>AVG(TSV18,13))

I won't know how it worked from Fridays data, until I run it later. I'm not sure if that is a fair test, after what the DOW did. After going through a few of them, I'm not sure how much the the scan for 5% up had. It didn't look earth shattering! Their were about 3-4 out of 14 that looked like they might have a chance. The rest had a flat money flow in Tab-2 bottom, or the BOP was headed downhill, and in the red. A MACD turn-around might help, along with something to catch the BOP just turning green. Anyway, you have given me something good to work with... and I'm doing the best I can. Thanks again...

Paid My Dues; st al(mcsteiny)

I've been busy trying the PCF's you wrote for the TSV18 series. I have tried a few new things, and I am seeing some good results. Now, my scans are giving me something on each side of 7 picks. Out of those, 3-4 look good enough to start researching. My little theory about the TSV '0' line, on Tab-3, middle is bearing some fruit. One thing I tried, was adjusting the scales on TSV18, and BOP today, to value, and; 20 low, and 32 high. This creates a range, and it seems to work for me pretty well. It helps filter the stocks I'm looking for. It seems to work better with the BOP. As I posted before, I rewrote your "TSV18 crossing its 13day MA," and added; "TSV18 up 5% crossing its 13day MA." Here is what I have in that scan:

a) TSV18 Up 5% and crossing its 13day MA

b) 15 day minimum Volume (set at 70k)

c) MA upward and crossing

d) BOP today set for value and range of 20-32

e) Price per share set for value $7-18

I first got 21 picks, and after setting the BOP today for range, it went down to 4, two looked good, and one good enough to trade (If no bad news, and good fundamentals). I felt that the 5% percent up I used was just a tad too much. I re-wrote the PCF for A 3% increase:

((TSV18>(TSV18.1*1.03)) AND (TSV18.1<AVG(TSV18.1,13)) AND (TSV18>AVG(TSV18,13))

This scan looked even better! I ended up with 7 picks, with two good enough to trade (without bad news, and good fundamentals). I'm still experimenting with your PCF; TSV18 zero crossover. I have tried it on a couple of other scans, and it seems to help, but not dramatically. I have to use it some more before I can report anything. What I have been seeing with the TSV seems to be true. If you bring that in at, or just above the zero line, and scan it for a sharp turn up, with the BOP set for range, everything else seems to pull in with it, in most cases.

Myron, try this(JIM P64)

TSV18>(TSV18.1*1.03)ANDTSV18.1<AVG(TSV18.1,13)ANDTSV18>AVG(TSV18,13).

I think this will give you what you want. I see in your posted formula that there are 7 of these ( and only 6 of these ) which is why you are getting the syntax error. Hope this helps......jim

TSV Crossover(mark ag)

I also use this in conjunction with the MACD Crossover to confirm the trend: --TSV Positive Zero Crossover of 3-day MA

((TSV14.1 + TSV14.2 + TSV14.3)/3) < 0 AND((TSV14 + TSV14.1 + TSV14.2)/3) > 0

TSV 43 bars>0(DanielExtreme)

Here is a partial answer to my own question. I have been able to set up a scan that illustrates the TSV 43 bar breaking above zero on a 1 day chart as follows with 13 week volume at least 25000:

((TSV43.1,4) < 0) AND ((TSV43,4) > 0) AND (AVGV63) > 250

In addition, I added Stoc7.3 crossing 10 as follows:

(STOC7.3.1) < (AVG(STOC7.3.1,10)) AND (STOC7.3) > (AVG(STOC7.3,10))

Finally, I added Antonio's WBMF as follows and combined all three in an Easy Scan:

((C - C1) > .5) AND (((V / (AVGV50.1 + 1)) - 1) * 100 > 39)

I got some nice results, the most interesting ones being PH, IENT, CBSI, ASYT, CNQR, AND WG280, THE COMMUNICATION LONG DISTANCE INDUSTRY GROUP. All of them appear to be safe entries. I am still looking for input on the scan for a Four Day chart if it is possible. Myron

More Info:

Go to the "Supplemental User Guide" and Look under "TSV".